Wall camera guard software#
Wall camera guard series#

Politicians who control the purse for security spending find a smart wall’s cost-effectiveness appealing over extending a physical wall that could cost millions of dollars per mile. So we have to be more flexible, more agile.” “Even if you put in a fence, ‘bad guys’ can use drones to carry drugs over that fence.

“In this 21st century, we have challenges, and I think we can use 21st-century solutions instead of a 14th-century solution called the wall,” said Cuellar in an interview with Recode.

Will Hurd (R-TX), Henry Cuellar (D-TX), and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Sen. Those supporters include House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Reps. Nevertheless, the idea of bolstering a technological wall has backing from key politicians on both sides of the aisle. The Palantir case is just one revelation, but there are many more contracts between major tech companies and immigration agencies that remain under scrutiny and whose details are relatively unknown.

Wall camera guard software#

Despite the company’s previous assurances to the contrary, it was recently revealed by the organization Mijente that Palantir, the data analytics firm founded by Peter Thiel, contracted software to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that reportedly helped target and arrest parents and other relatives of unaccompanied minors crossing the US-Mexico border.

Wall camera guard series#

These groups’ worries are understandable, particularly given the recent series of revelations showing how tech is already being used to enforce controversial immigration policies. Major civil liberty and digital privacy groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Fight for the Future have argued that a hypothetical virtual wall integrating technology - like facial recognition and drones - could propel a state of perpetual surveillance that would infringe on the human rights of immigrants and US citizens alike. Some research has suggested that the last major effort to increase technology at the border may have contributed to an increase in the number of deaths of migrants crossing the border, because they were forced into taking more treacherous routes to avoid detection.Īnd then there are the privacy concerns. Many have lobbed serious ethical and human rights objections to building this virtual wall. The vision, as laid out by its bipartisan political supporters, is to build an ocean-to-ocean technological barrier made up of a patchwork of tools like drones and sensors to help surveil and identify unauthorized individuals crossing the border, specifically in remote stretches of land between established ports of entry. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Imagesīut there is another kind of border wall increasingly being talked about - one that proponents pitch as being less costly, less disruptive, and less politically controversial than a physical barrier: a so-called “smart wall.” President Trump tours the US-Mexico border wall in Calexico, California, on April 5, 2019. The actual crisis, they say, is a humanitarian one worsened by Trump’s restrictive immigration policies - about refugees seeking lawful entry into the US to flee violence and poverty in their home countries.

It says unchecked immigration is a national security crisis, and one that needs to be addressed.Ĭritics, meanwhile, argue that the wall is a wildly expensive, ineffective, and misdirected effort. The Trump administration has argued that the border wall is a necessary deterrent to drug smugglers and immigrants seeking to enter the country unlawfully. In an era of increasingly polarized politics, there are few issues as divisive as President Trump’s proposal to build a physical wall across part of the 2,000-mile US-Mexico border.